How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Flex 2 vs nearphones HA-NP50T

JBL Tune Flex 2 vs JVC nearphones HA-NP50T

What Tune Flex 2 does better (3) and where nearphones HA-NP50T wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune Flex 2
JBL · 2024Tune Flex 2
7.7Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP50T
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $55
7.2Noise control & calls4.2
7.4Battery7.0
6.0Build & features2.6

Why is Tune Flex 2 better than nearphones HA-NP50T?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · nearphones HA-NP50T: No
  2. Battery life12 h vs 9.5 h+26%
  3. Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 8 g+90%

Why is nearphones HA-NP50T better than Tune Flex 2?

  1. Total with charging case24 h vs 38 h+58%
  2. Driver size12 mm vs 16 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune Flex 2JBL Tune Flex 2≈ $557.7
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm16 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance13 Ω—
Sensitivity98 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h9.5 h
Battery life with ANC8 h—
Total with charging case24 h38 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g8 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare