Why is Tune Buds better than WF-C500?
- Active noise cancellingYes · WF-C500: No
- Total with charging case48 h vs 20 h2.4×
- Battery life12 h vs 10 h+20%
- Driver size10 mm vs 5.8 mm+72%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is WF-C500 better than Tune Buds?
WF-C500 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 12 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 10 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 48 h | 20 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.4 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
