How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Buds vs nearphones HA-NP50T

JBL Tune Buds vs JVC nearphones HA-NP50T

What Tune Buds does better (3) and where nearphones HA-NP50T wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune Buds
JBL · 2023Tune Buds
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
JVC nearphones HA-NP50T
4.8Score
1 advantage≈ $55
5.9Noise control & calls4.2
8.9Battery7.0

Why is Tune Buds better than nearphones HA-NP50T?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · nearphones HA-NP50T: No
  2. Battery life12 h vs 9.5 h+26%
  3. Total with charging case48 h vs 38 h+26%

Why is nearphones HA-NP50T better than Tune Buds?

  1. Driver size10 mm vs 16 mm+60%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune BudsJBL Tune Buds≈ $559.3
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm16 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity101 dB—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h9.5 h
Battery life with ANC10 h—
Total with charging case48 h38 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—8 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare