How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Beam vs CMF Buds Pro 2

JBL Tune Beam vs Nothing CMF Buds Pro 2

What Tune Beam does better (2) and where CMF Buds Pro 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune Beam
JBL · 2023Tune Beam
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Nothing CMF Buds Pro 2
Nothing · 2024CMF Buds Pro 2
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $55
8.6Noise control & calls8.4
8.8Battery8.2

Why is Tune Beam better than CMF Buds Pro 2?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 11 h+9%
  2. Battery life with ANC10 h vs 7 h+43%

Why is CMF Buds Pro 2 better than Tune Beam?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  2. Driver size6 mm vs 11 mm+83%
  3. Microphones4 vs 6+50%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune BeamJBL Tune Beam≈ $609.4
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size6 mm11 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity97 dB—
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones46
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h11 h
Battery life with ANC10 h7 h
Total with charging case—43 h
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare