How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Beam vs XX HA-XC72T

JBL Tune Beam vs JVC XX HA-XC72T

What Tune Beam does better (2) and where XX HA-XC72T wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune Beam
JBL · 2023Tune Beam
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
JVC XX HA-XC72T
JVC · 2022XX HA-XC72T
8.7Score
1 advantage≈ $65
8.6Noise control & calls7.2
8.8Battery6.7

Why is Tune Beam better than XX HA-XC72T?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 9 h+33%
  2. Battery life with ANC10 h vs 7.5 h+33%

Why is XX HA-XC72T better than Tune Beam?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune BeamJBL Tune Beam≈ $609.4
JVC XX HA-XC72TJVC XX HA-XC72T≈ $658.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver size6 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity97 dB—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones4—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h9 h
Battery life with ANC10 h7.5 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.6 g
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare