How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 770NC vs WH-CH720N

JBL Tune 770NC vs Sony WH-CH720N

What Tune 770NC does better (4) and where WH-CH720N wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 770NC
JBL · 2023Tune 770NC
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-CH720N
Sony · 2023WH-CH720N
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $65
6.9Noise control & calls7.8
7.8Battery5.0

Why is Tune 770NC better than WH-CH720N?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 50 h+40%
  2. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 32 h+38%
  3. Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
  4. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%

Why is WH-CH720N better than Tune 770NC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  2. Weight232 g vs 192 g+21%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 770NCJBL Tune 770NC≈ $708.0
Sony WH-CH720NSony WH-CH720N≈ $656.6
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω31 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB108 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h50 h
Battery life with ANC44 h32 h
Charging time2 h3.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight232 g192 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare