How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 770NC vs TAH8856

JBL Tune 770NC vs Philips TAH8856

What Tune 770NC does better (3) and where TAH8856 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 770NC
JBL · 2023Tune 770NC
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8856
Philips · 2022TAH8856
6.4Score
0 advantages≈ $90
6.9Noise control & calls7.8
7.8Battery6.3

Why is Tune 770NC better than TAH8856?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 60 h+17%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 5 h2.5×
  3. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%

Why is TAH8856 better than Tune 770NC?

TAH8856 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 770NCJBL Tune 770NC≈ $708.0
Philips TAH8856Philips TAH8856≈ $906.4
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h60 h
Battery life with ANC44 h—
Charging time2 h5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight232 g—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare