How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 770NC vs TAH6509

JBL Tune 770NC vs Philips TAH6509

What Tune 770NC does better (0) and where TAH6509 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 770NC
JBL · 2023Tune 770NC
7.9Score
0 advantages≈ $70
vs
Philips TAH6509
Philips · 2024TAH6509
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls9.2
7.7Battery8.2

Why is Tune 770NC better than TAH6509?

Tune 770NC has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH6509 better than Tune 770NC?

  1. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  2. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 45 h+2%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 770NCJBL Tune 770NC≈ $707.9
Philips TAH6509Philips TAH6509≈ $659.4
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h70 h
Battery life with ANC44 h45 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight232 g—
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare