How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 760NC vs NiceComfort 35

JBL Tune 760NC vs Srhythm NiceComfort 35

What Tune 760NC does better (1) and where NiceComfort 35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 760NC
JBL · 2022Tune 760NC
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $75
vs
Srhythm NiceComfort 35
Srhythm · 2020NiceComfort 35
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls9.2
5.7Battery5.8

Why is Tune 760NC better than NiceComfort 35?

  1. Battery life with ANC35 h vs 30 h+17%

Why is NiceComfort 35 better than Tune 760NC?

  1. Weight220 g vs 180 g+22%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 760NCJBL Tune 760NC≈ $758.1
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity103 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h50 h
Battery life with ANC35 h30 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight220 g180 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare