How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 760NC vs TAH8856

JBL Tune 760NC vs Philips TAH8856

What Tune 760NC does better (1) and where TAH8856 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 760NC
JBL · 2022Tune 760NC
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8856
Philips · 2022TAH8856
6.4Score
1 advantage≈ $90
9.2Noise control & calls7.8
5.8Battery6.3

Why is Tune 760NC better than TAH8856?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 5 h2.5×

Why is TAH8856 better than Tune 760NC?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 60 h+20%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 760NCJBL Tune 760NC≈ $758.2
Philips TAH8856Philips TAH8856≈ $906.4
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity103 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h60 h
Battery life with ANC35 h—
Charging time2 h5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight220 g—
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare