How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 680NC vs WH-CH735N

JBL Tune 680NC vs Sony WH-CH735N

What Tune 680NC does better (3) and where WH-CH735N wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 680NC
JBL · 2026Tune 680NC
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-CH735N
Sony · 2026WH-CH735N
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $110
6.5Noise control & calls5.9
8.5Battery7.8

Why is Tune 680NC better than WH-CH735N?

  1. Weight158 g vs 207 g+31%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%

Why is WH-CH735N better than Tune 680NC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 6 Hz3.3×
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 680NCJBL Tune 680NC≈ $708.9
Sony WH-CH735NSony WH-CH735N≈ $1107.0
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω100 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB108 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones22
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h75 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity680 mAh—
Charging time2 h3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight158 g207 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare