How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 680NC vs WH-CH535

JBL Tune 680NC vs Sony WH-CH535

What Tune 680NC does better (5) and where WH-CH535 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 680NC
JBL · 2026Tune 680NC
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-CH535
Sony · 2026WH-CH535
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $55
7.0Noise control & calls6.0
8.4Battery5.6

Why is Tune 680NC better than WH-CH535?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · WH-CH535: No
  2. Battery life76 h vs 55 h+38%
  3. Battery capacity680 mAh vs 150 mAh4.5×
  4. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  5. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%

Why is WH-CH535 better than Tune 680NC?

  1. Weight158 g vs 150 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 680NCJBL Tune 680NC≈ $658.9
Sony WH-CH535Sony WH-CH535≈ $554.5
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity98 dB—
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Microphones2—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life76 h55 h
Battery capacity680 mAh150 mAh
Charging time2 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—3 min → 1,5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight158 g150 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare