How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 670NC vs NiceComfort 35

JBL Tune 670NC vs Srhythm NiceComfort 35

What Tune 670NC does better (4) and where NiceComfort 35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 670NC
JBL · 2023Tune 670NC
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $60
vs
Srhythm NiceComfort 35
Srhythm · 2020NiceComfort 35
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls9.2
7.7Battery5.8

Why is Tune 670NC better than NiceComfort 35?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 50 h+40%
  2. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 30 h+47%
  3. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
  4. Weight174 g vs 180 g+3%

Why is NiceComfort 35 better than Tune 670NC?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 670NCJBL Tune 670NC≈ $607.9
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h50 h
Battery life with ANC44 h30 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 3 h10 min → 3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight174 g180 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare