How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 670NC vs WH-CH720N

JBL Tune 670NC vs Sony WH-CH720N

What Tune 670NC does better (5) and where WH-CH720N wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 670NC
JBL · 2023Tune 670NC
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-CH720N
Sony · 2023WH-CH720N
6.6Score
1 advantage≈ $65
6.9Noise control & calls7.8
7.8Battery5.0

Why is Tune 670NC better than WH-CH720N?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 50 h+40%
  2. Battery life with ANC44 h vs 32 h+38%
  3. Weight174 g vs 192 g+10%
  4. Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
  5. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%

Why is WH-CH720N better than Tune 670NC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 670NCJBL Tune 670NC≈ $608.0
Sony WH-CH720NSony WH-CH720N≈ $656.6
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω31 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB108 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h50 h
Battery life with ANC44 h32 h
Charging time2 h3.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight174 g192 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare