How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 670NC vs TAA4216BK/00

JBL Tune 670NC vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What Tune 670NC does better (4) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 670NC
JBL · 2023Tune 670NC
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $50
7.2Noise control & calls4.0
7.7Battery5.2

Why is Tune 670NC better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA4216BK/00: No
  2. Battery life70 h vs 35 h2×
  3. Weight174 g vs 214 g+23%
  4. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than Tune 670NC?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 670NCJBL Tune 670NC≈ $607.9
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB118 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h35 h
Battery life with ANC44 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight174 g214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare