vs
9.0Battery9.4
Why is TUNE 530BT better than H20 TZ-T12052?
TUNE 530BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is H20 TZ-T12052 better than TUNE 530BT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TUNE 530BT: Yes
- Battery life76 h vs 90 h+18%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · TUNE 530BT: Yes
- Driver size33 mm vs 40 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 33 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 76 h | 90 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 152 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
