How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 520C vs TAH4209

JBL Tune 520C vs Philips TAH4209

What Tune 520C does better (0) and where TAH4209 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 520C
JBL · 2025Tune 520C
0 advantages≈ $16
vs
Philips TAH4209
Philips · 2024TAH4209
4.8Score
0 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Tune 520C better than TAH4209?

Tune 520C has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH4209 better than Tune 520C?

TAH4209 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH4209Philips TAH4209≈ $254.8
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size33 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance30 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB112 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—55 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, SiriGoogle Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight157 g160 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare