How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 255NC vs WF-C710N

JBL Tune 255NC vs Sony WF-C710N

What Tune 255NC does better (4) and where WF-C710N wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Sony WF-C710N
Sony · 2025WF-C710N
7.0Score
0 advantages≈ $80
5.7Noise control & calls7.2
9.3Battery6.9
4.1Build & features4.6

Why is Tune 255NC better than WF-C710N?

  1. Total with charging case48 h vs 22 h2.2×
  2. Battery life with ANC12 h vs 8 h+50%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 5 mm2×
  4. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is WF-C710N better than Tune 255NC?

WF-C710N has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $708.0
Sony WF-C710NSony WF-C710N≈ $807.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size10 mm5 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h12 h
Battery life with ANC12 h8 h
Total with charging case48 h22 h
Battery capacity65 mAh—
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight52 g—
Earbud weight (each)—5.2 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare