How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 255NC vs Enco X3s

JBL Tune 255NC vs OPPO Enco X3s

What Tune 255NC does better (4) and where Enco X3s wins (5) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
OPPO Enco X3s
OPPO · 2025Enco X3s
7.1Score
5 advantages≈ $85
5.7Noise control & calls5.7
9.3Battery3.9
4.1Build & features8.0

Why is Tune 255NC better than Enco X3s?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 6 h2×
  2. Battery life with ANC12 h vs 4 h3×
  3. Total with charging case48 h vs 24 h2×
  4. Battery capacity65 mAh vs 62 mAh+5%

Why is Enco X3s better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
  4. Weight52 g vs 50 g+4%
  5. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $708.0
OPPO Enco X3sOPPO Enco X3s≈ $857.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz15 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB118 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h6 h
Battery life with ANC12 h4 h
Total with charging case48 h24 h
Battery capacity65 mAh62 mAh
Charging time2 h1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, LHDC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight52 g50 g
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlackSilver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare