How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 255NC vs Enco Air5 Pro

JBL Tune 255NC vs OPPO Enco Air5 Pro

What Tune 255NC does better (1) and where Enco Air5 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $70
vs
OPPO Enco Air5 Pro
OPPO · 2026Enco Air5 Pro
9.5Score
6 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
5.7Noise control & calls5.6
9.3Battery9.5

Why is Tune 255NC better than Enco Air5 Pro?

  1. Battery life with ANC12 h vs 7 h+71%

Why is Enco Air5 Pro better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 13 h+8%
  2. Battery capacity65 mAh vs 440 mAh6.8×
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  4. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
  5. Total with charging case48 h vs 54 h+12%
  6. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $708.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω31 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones—3
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h13 h
Battery life with ANC12 h7 h
Total with charging case48 h54 h
Battery capacity65 mAh440 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36
Bluetooth codecs—LHDC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight52 g—
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare