How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 255NC vs 4XD1R31390

JBL Tune 255NC vs Lenovo 4XD1R31390

What Tune 255NC does better (2) and where 4XD1R31390 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
7.9Score
2 advantages≈ $75
vs
Lenovo 4XD1R31390
Lenovo · 20254XD1R31390
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
5.7Noise control & calls9.3
9.3Battery4.3
3.5Build & features8.3

Why is Tune 255NC better than 4XD1R31390?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 7 h+71%
  2. Battery life with ANC12 h vs 4 h3×

Why is 4XD1R31390 better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
  3. Weight52 g vs 47 g+11%
  4. Driver size10 mm vs 12.2 mm+22%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $757.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver size10 mm12.2 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h7 h
Battery life with ANC12 h4 h
Total with charging case48 h—
Battery capacity65 mAh—
Charging time2 h1 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight52 g47 g
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare