How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 255NC vs HA-EC75T

JBL Tune 255NC vs JVC HA-EC75T

What Tune 255NC does better (4) and where HA-EC75T wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $70
vs
JVC HA-EC75T
JVC · 2025HA-EC75T
9.0Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
5.7Noise control & calls7.2
9.3Battery8.3

Why is Tune 255NC better than HA-EC75T?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 11 h+9%
  2. Battery life with ANC12 h vs 9 h+33%
  3. Total with charging case48 h vs 40 h+20%
  4. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%

Why is HA-EC75T better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $708.0
JVC HA-EC75TJVC HA-EC75T≈ $609.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity100 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h11 h
Battery life with ANC12 h9 h
Total with charging case48 h40 h
Battery capacity65 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight52 g—
Protection ratingIP54IP57
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare