How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 245 NC vs TAA6709BK/00

JBL Tune 245 NC vs Philips TAA6709BK/00

What Tune 245 NC does better (4) and where TAA6709BK/00 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 245 NC
JBL · 2025Tune 245 NC
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA6709BK/00
Philips · 2025TAA6709BK/00
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $55
6.1Noise control & calls4.2
8.9Battery4.4

Why is Tune 245 NC better than TAA6709BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA6709BK/00: No
  2. Battery life12 h vs 7 h+71%
  3. Total with charging case48 h vs 28 h+71%
  4. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 150 Hz7.5×

Why is TAA6709BK/00 better than Tune 245 NC?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  2. Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 245 NCJBL Tune 245 NC≈ $558.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size6 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz150 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity97 dB91 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h7 h
Battery life with ANC10 h—
Total with charging case48 h28 h
Battery capacity—58 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5 g—
Protection ratingIP54IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlackBlack, Red
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare