How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 245 NC vs HA-A30T2

JBL Tune 245 NC vs JVC HA-A30T2

What Tune 245 NC does better (2) and where HA-A30T2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 245 NC
JBL · 2025Tune 245 NC
8.2Score
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
JVC HA-A30T2
JVC · 2024HA-A30T2
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $50
Higher score
6.1Noise control & calls7.2
8.9Battery8.6
4.8Build & features5.6

Why is Tune 245 NC better than HA-A30T2?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 11 h+9%
  2. Battery life with ANC10 h vs 8.5 h+18%

Why is HA-A30T2 better than Tune 245 NC?

  1. Earbud weight (each)5 g vs 4.5 g+11%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 245 NCJBL Tune 245 NC≈ $558.2
JVC HA-A30T2JVC HA-A30T2≈ $508.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver size6 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity97 dB—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h11 h
Battery life with ANC10 h8.5 h
Total with charging case48 h—
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5 g4.5 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare