How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune 230NC TWS vs XX HA-XC72T

JBL Tune 230NC TWS vs JVC XX HA-XC72T

What Tune 230NC TWS does better (2) and where XX HA-XC72T wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tune 230NC TWS
JBL · 2021Tune 230NC TWS
7.1Score
2 advantages≈ $60
vs
JVC XX HA-XC72T
JVC · 2022XX HA-XC72T
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
7.9Battery6.7
2.3Build & features8.6

Why is Tune 230NC TWS better than XX HA-XC72T?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
  2. Battery life with ANC8 h vs 7.5 h+7%

Why is XX HA-XC72T better than Tune 230NC TWS?

  1. Earbud weight (each)10.2 g vs 4.6 g2.2×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC XX HA-XC72TJVC XX HA-XC72T≈ $658.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver size6 mm6 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity105 dB—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h9 h
Battery life with ANC8 h7.5 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)10.2 g4.6 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare