7.4Battery3.3
Why is Tune 215BT better than Ne HP-R100BT?
- Battery life16 h vs 8 h2×
Why is Ne HP-R100BT better than Tune 215BT?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Neckband | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 118 dB | 96 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 16 h | 8 h |
| Battery capacity | 130 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 18 g | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
