How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 135BT vs Cadenza

JBL TUNE 135BT vs Kiwi Ears Cadenza

What TUNE 135BT does better (0) and where Cadenza wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 135BT
JBL · 2026TUNE 135BT
7.2Score
0 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
Kiwi Ears Cadenza
Kiwi Ears · 2026Cadenza
1 advantage≈ $40

Why is TUNE 135BT better than Cadenza?

TUNE 135BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Cadenza better than TUNE 135BT?

  1. Driver size8.6 mm vs 10 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 135BTJBL TUNE 135BT≈ $307.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size8.6 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity99 dB110 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h—
Battery capacity130 mAh—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight19 g—
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare