How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TUNE 135BT vs Tune 310C

JBL TUNE 135BT vs JBL Tune 310C

What TUNE 135BT does better (0) and where Tune 310C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL TUNE 135BT
JBL · 2026TUNE 135BT
7.2Score
0 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
vs
JBL Tune 310C
JBL · 2024Tune 310C
3 advantages≈ $17

Why is TUNE 135BT better than Tune 310C?

TUNE 135BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Tune 310C better than TUNE 135BT?

  1. Weight19 g vs 14 g+31%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size8.6 mm vs 9 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL TUNE 135BTJBL TUNE 135BT≈ $307.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size8.6 mm9 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity99 dB98 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h—
Battery capacity130 mAh—
Charging time2 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight19 g14 g
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare