vs
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
6.6Battery5.9
Why is Tune 130NC TWS better than TAT8506?
Tune 130NC TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAT8506 better than Tune 130NC TWS?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | 104 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 8 h | — |
| Total with charging case | — | 32 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 11.4 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
