vs
6.6Battery8.3
Why is Tune 130NC TWS better than FALCON Pro?
Tune 130NC TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FALCON Pro better than Tune 130NC TWS?
- Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)11.4 g vs 6 g+90%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 24,000 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | — | Hybrid |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 24,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 8 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 11.4 g | 6 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
