vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
6.6Battery6.1
Why is Tune 130NC TWS better than FALCON ANC?
Tune 130NC TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FALCON ANC better than Tune 130NC TWS?
- Battery life8 h vs 8.5 h+6%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 42,000 Hz2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 42,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 8 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 11.4 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
