How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TOUR PRO+ TWS vs TAT8506

JBL TOUR PRO+ TWS vs Philips TAT8506

What TOUR PRO+ TWS does better (1) and where TAT8506 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

JBL TOUR PRO+ TWS
JBL · 2021TOUR PRO+ TWS
7.6Score
1 advantage≈ $130
vs
Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
5.3Battery5.9

Why is TOUR PRO+ TWS better than TAT8506?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is TAT8506 better than TOUR PRO+ TWS?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TOUR PRO+ TWS: Yes
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. LDACNo · TOUR PRO+ TWS: Yes
  4. Driver size6.8 mm vs 13 mm+91%
  5. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
  6. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 7 Hz+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6.8 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h8 h
Battery life with ANC6 h—
Total with charging case—32 h
Charging time2 h—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.5 g—
Protection ratingIPX5IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare