How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tour One M3 vs Signature Pure

JBL Tour One M3 vs UltraSone Signature Pure

What Tour One M3 does better (4) and where Signature Pure wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Tour One M3
JBL · 2025Tour One M3
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
vs
UltraSone Signature Pure
UltraSone · 2024Signature Pure
2 advantages≈ $200
6.9Noise control & calls4.0

Why is Tour One M3 better than Signature Pure?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Signature Pure: No
  2. Weight278 g vs 294 g+6%
  3. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  4. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+14%

Why is Signature Pure better than Tour One M3?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
  2. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 8 Hz+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tour One M3JBL Tour One M3≈ $2307.9
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency10 Hz8 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz35,000 Hz
Impedance18 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity122 dB114 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones8—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h—
Battery life with ANC40 h—
Charging time2 h3 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsLDAC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight278 g294 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare