How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Reflect Mini NC vs TAT8506

JBL Reflect Mini NC vs Philips TAT8506

What Reflect Mini NC does better (0) and where TAT8506 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

JBL Reflect Mini NC
JBL · 2020Reflect Mini NC
6.4Score
0 advantages≈ $110
vs
Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.0Score
4 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
4.1Battery5.8

Why is Reflect Mini NC better than TAT8506?

Reflect Mini NC has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAT8506 better than Reflect Mini NC?

  1. Battery life7 h vs 8 h+14%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  3. Driver size6 mm vs 13 mm2.2×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6 mm13 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life7 h8 h
Battery life with ANC6 h—
Total with charging case—32 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.2
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)2 g—
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare