How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Quantum TWS vs TAT8506

JBL Quantum TWS vs Philips TAT8506

What Quantum TWS does better (0) and where TAT8506 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Quantum TWS
JBL · 2022Quantum TWS
7.0Score
0 advantages≈ $80
vs
Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
9.3Noise control & calls9.3
4.6Battery5.8

Why is Quantum TWS better than TAT8506?

Quantum TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAT8506 better than Quantum TWS?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 13 mm+30%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Quantum TWSJBL Quantum TWS≈ $807.0
Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity106 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h8 h
Battery life with ANC5 h—
Total with charging case—32 h
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa, Google Assistant—
Design & build
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare