How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Live Flex vs EAH-AZ40M2

JBL Live Flex vs Technics EAH-AZ40M2

What Live Flex does better (3) and where EAH-AZ40M2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Live Flex
JBL · 2023Live Flex
5.5Score
3 advantages≈ $65
vs
Technics EAH-AZ40M2
Technics · 2023EAH-AZ40M2
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
4.8Noise control & calls7.2
6.2Battery3.7

Why is Live Flex better than EAH-AZ40M2?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
  2. Total with charging case40 h vs 24 h+67%
  3. Driver size12 mm vs 6 mm2×

Why is EAH-AZ40M2 better than Live Flex?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Live Flex: Yes
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Live FlexJBL Live Flex≈ $655.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance93 Ω—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7 h
Battery life with ANC—5 h
Total with charging case40 h24 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)15 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Alexa
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—5 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare