How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Live 670NC vs TAH6509

JBL Live 670NC vs Philips TAH6509

What Live 670NC does better (1) and where TAH6509 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Live 670NC
JBL · 2023Live 670NC
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $75
vs
Philips TAH6509
Philips · 2024TAH6509
9.4Score
3 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
7.0Noise control & calls9.2
7.3Battery8.2

Why is Live 670NC better than TAH6509?

  1. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 45 h+11%

Why is TAH6509 better than Live 670NC?

  1. Battery life65 h vs 70 h+8%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Live 670NCJBL Live 670NC≈ $758.2
Philips TAH6509Philips TAH6509≈ $659.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity98 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life65 h70 h
Battery life with ANC50 h45 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantAlexa—
Design & build
Weight219 g—
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare