How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320C vs TAK4200

JBL Junior 320C vs Philips TAK4200

What Junior 320C does better (3) and where TAK4200 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320C
JBL · 2026Junior 320C
3 advantages≈ $40
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls6.0

Why is Junior 320C better than TAK4200?

  1. Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Weight117 g vs 129 g+10%

Why is TAK4200 better than Junior 320C?

TAK4200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $304.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency10 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity85 dB85 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Battery capacity—300 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight117 g129 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare