How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320BT vs TAK5500RT

JBL Junior 320BT vs Philips TAK5500RT

What Junior 320BT does better (1) and where TAK5500RT wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320BT
JBL · 2024Junior 320BT
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK5500RT
Philips · 2025TAK5500RT
1 advantage≈ $45
3.8Noise control & calls9.2

Why is Junior 320BT better than TAK5500RT?

  1. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 75 mAh6.7×

Why is TAK5500RT better than Junior 320BT?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Junior 320BT: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size30 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω115 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB115 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h—
Battery capacity500 mAh75 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight122 g—
FoldableYes—
Colours—Green, Blue
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare