How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. JR310BT vs Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

JBL JR310BT vs Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

What JR310BT does better (0) and where Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL JR310BT
JBL · 2020JR310BT
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ $45
vs
Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.7Battery3.4

Why is JR310BT better than Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones?

JR310BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones better than JR310BT?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 22 h+83%
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL JR310BTJBL JR310BT≈ $453.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity85 dB126 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h22 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight113 g—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare