How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. JR310BT vs TAH5205WT/00

JBL JR310BT vs Philips TAH5205WT/00

What JR310BT does better (2) and where TAH5205WT/00 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL JR310BT
JBL · 2020JR310BT
3.7Score
2 advantages≈ $45
vs
Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
2.7Battery2.8

Why is JR310BT better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Weight113 g vs 210 g+86%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than JR310BT?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 29 h2.4×
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL JR310BTJBL JR310BT≈ $453.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity85 dB90 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h29 h
Charging time2 h3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight113 g210 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—White
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare