How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs RB-EB220

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs Red Bull Racing RB-EB220

What Endurance Run 3 Wireless does better (2) and where RB-EB220 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
vs
Red Bull Racing RB-EB220
Red Bull Racing · 2025RB-EB220
6.1Score
2 advantages≈ $45
3.0Noise control & calls9.3
9.0Battery3.4

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wireless better than RB-EB220?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 6 h4.2×
  2. Battery capacity65 mAh vs 30 mAh2.2×

Why is RB-EB220 better than Endurance Run 3 Wireless?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Endurance Run 3 Wireless: Yes
  2. Charging time3 h vs 1.5 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver size—13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance130 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity—120 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h6 h
Battery capacity65 mAh30 mAh
Charging time3 h1.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIP65—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Colours—Blue
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare