How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs CMF Buds 2 Plus

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus

What Endurance Run 3 Wireless does better (3) and where CMF Buds 2 Plus wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $35
vs
Nothing CMF Buds 2 Plus
Nothing · 2025CMF Buds 2 Plus
9.5Score
2 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls8.3
9.0Battery9.0
9.3Build & features8.7

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wireless better than CMF Buds 2 Plus?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 14 h+79%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 4.5 h2.2×
  3. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%

Why is CMF Buds 2 Plus better than Endurance Run 3 Wireless?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Endurance Run 3 Wireless: Yes
  2. Driver size8 mm vs 12 mm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size8 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity98 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h14 h
Battery life with ANC—33 h
Total with charging case—62 h
Battery capacity—53 mAh
Charging time2 h4.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h10 min → 4,5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight21 g—
Earbud weight (each)—4.5 g
Protection ratingIP65IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)65
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare