How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs CMF Buds 2

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless vs Nothing CMF Buds 2

What Endurance Run 3 Wireless does better (3) and where CMF Buds 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wireless
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $35
vs
Nothing CMF Buds 2
Nothing · 2025CMF Buds 2
9.4Score
2 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls5.1
9.0Battery9.4

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wireless better than CMF Buds 2?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 13 h+92%
  2. Battery capacity65 mAh vs 53 mAh+23%
  3. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%

Why is CMF Buds 2 better than Endurance Run 3 Wireless?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Endurance Run 3 Wireless: Yes
  2. Charging time3 h vs 1.5 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—11 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance130 Ω—
Sensitivity—48 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h13 h
Battery life with ANC—32 h
Total with charging case—55 h
Battery capacity65 mAh53 mAh
Charging time3 h1.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.5 g
Protection ratingIP65IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx5
Dust protection (IP)65
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare