How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm vs TAT2100

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm vs Philips TAT2100

What Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm does better (2) and where TAT2100 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm
2 advantages≈ $20
vs
Philips TAT2100
Philips · 2026TAT2100
1 advantage≈ $20
3.1Noise control & calls9.2

Why is Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm better than TAT2100?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  2. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is TAT2100 better than Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Endurance Run 3 Wired 3,5 mm: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Sensitivity—105 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Total with charging case—36 h
Battery capacity—50 mAh
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Protection ratingIP65IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare