How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ENDURANCE PEAK 3 vs TAT8506

JBL ENDURANCE PEAK 3 vs Philips TAT8506

What ENDURANCE PEAK 3 does better (2) and where TAT8506 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

JBL ENDURANCE PEAK 3
JBL · 2022ENDURANCE PEAK 3
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Philips TAT8506
Philips · 2022TAT8506
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $95
7.7Battery5.8

Why is ENDURANCE PEAK 3 better than TAT8506?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×

Why is TAT8506 better than ENDURANCE PEAK 3?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · ENDURANCE PEAK 3: Yes
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. LDACNo · ENDURANCE PEAK 3: Yes
  5. Driver size10 mm vs 13 mm+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT8506Philips TAT8506≈ $958.0
Sound
Fit—In-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm13 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h8 h
Total with charging case—32 h
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)12.5 g—
Protection ratingIP68IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare