vs
4.7Battery6.0
Why is Endurance Pace better than AQUA LIGHT?
Endurance Pace has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is AQUA LIGHT better than Endurance Pace?
- Charging time4 h vs 1 h4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 18 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 9 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 104 dB | 117 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 4 h | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 33 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
