How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Pace vs Float Run WI-OE610

JBL Endurance Pace vs Sony Float Run WI-OE610

What Endurance Pace does better (3) and where Float Run WI-OE610 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Sony Float Run WI-OE610
Sony · 2023Float Run WI-OE610
4.0Score
1 advantage≈ $90
4.7Battery4.4
7.0Build & features3.3

Why is Endurance Pace better than Float Run WI-OE610?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
  3. Driver size18 mm vs 16 mm+12%

Why is Float Run WI-OE610 better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Charging time4 h vs 3 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size18 mm16 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity104 dB—
Noise control
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h10 h
Charging time4 h3 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight33 g33 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare