How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Pace vs OpenRun Mini USB-C

JBL Endurance Pace vs Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C

What Endurance Pace does better (4) and where OpenRun Mini USB-C wins (1) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
4 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
vs
Shokz OpenRun Mini USB-C
Shokz · 2024OpenRun Mini USB-C
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $95
4.2Battery5.2
6.9Build & features2.4

Why is Endurance Pace better than OpenRun Mini USB-C?

  1. Weight33 g vs 380 g11.5×
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  3. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.1+6%
  4. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 21 Hz+5%

Why is OpenRun Mini USB-C better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Charging time4 h vs 1.5 h2.7×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOpen-earBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size18 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz21 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB4 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h10 h
Charging time4 h1.5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.1
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight33 g380 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare