How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Pace vs OpenRun

JBL Endurance Pace vs Shokz OpenRun

What Endurance Pace does better (2) and where OpenRun wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Pace
JBL · 2025Endurance Pace
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $75
vs
Shokz OpenRun
Shokz · 2025OpenRun
6.6Score
2 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
4.7Battery3.9
7.0Build & features8.2

Why is Endurance Pace better than OpenRun?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.1+6%

Why is OpenRun better than Endurance Pace?

  1. Charging time4 h vs 1.5 h2.7×
  2. Weight33 g vs 26 g+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Shokz OpenRunShokz OpenRun≈ $1306.6
Sound
FitOpen-earBone conduction
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size18 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω8 Ω
Sensitivity104 dB105 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h8 h
Battery capacity—160 mAh
Charging time4 h1.5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.1
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight33 g26 g
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Colours—Black, Grey, Blue, Purple, Red
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare